ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION – HEALTH – PROTECTION
- Summary
- About electromagnetic radiation
- How human health is endangered
- What is happening in our homes and offices?
- My experience so far
- Homes in the vicinity of power-transmission stations
- How can we protect our homes?
- Protection against the radiation coming from neighbouring houses
- Where should the absorbers be placed?
  MICROWAVE RADIATION AND FERTILITY
  ELECTROSMOG AND CANCER
  THE CAUSE OF TUMOUR DOES NOT LIE IN THE HUMAN ORGANISM
- Glands
  ELECTROSMOG AND BREAST CANCER
  ELECTROSMOG AND INCUBATORS



- Summary
Electrical energy is transmitted from generator to consumer along cables of both high and low voltage, running above and underground. Because they are conducting electrical energy, these cables act as antennae for the Earth’s radiation, cosmic radiation and radiation coming from a wide spectrum of man-made appliances.
When electrical energy is ‘polluted’ by parasitic signals, this causes the phenomenon of electrosmog.

- About electromagnetic radiation

Electric energy is generally considered to be ‘safe’ and ‘clean’, but that is only because its real effects are not plainly visible. Electric currents create magnetic fields around the conductor, which are said to be a special form of matter, with its own mass and energy. As regards electric fields, they are formed around a conductor under potential - voltage, and it also has its own mass and energy. The environment around the electric field undergoes qualitative changes, and these changes are not for the better.

Domestic appliances operate within an extremely wide range of electrical frequencies, from 150KHz (long waves) to microwaves. When connected to the mains electricity, these frequencies feed back into the system.

- How human health is endangered

In the early 1970s, health problems were recognised among people working near computer or surveillance and control monitors, or near television sets. In 1979, Nancy Wertheimer and Ed Leeper, researchers from Denver, Colorado, published their conclusion that children living near high-voltage transmitting cables suffer from leukaemia more often that those who do not. The research in that field of science intensified during the 1980s, and in 1988 David Savitz, professor at the North Carolina University, confirmed the findings of Wertheimer and Leeper. Subsequent researches in Finland, Sweden and Denmark showed that existence of electromagnetic field of over 1 mG is closely connected to the occurrence of leukaemia among children, whereas leukaemia occurred four times more often where electromagnetic field was stronger than 4mG. In Canada and the United States the statistics show that 73% of the women who work more than 20 hours per week near monitors have problematic pregnancies.

As from 1988, there has been an increase in breast cancer of 3% per year among American women, and 44,000 women die of breast cancer every year. David Savitz found that women doing electrotechnic work are four times more prone to breast cancer than those who do not. .

Scientists are now trying to determine the dividing line between the harmful and the non-harmful radiation. In the West, 2 mG is considered the limit, but it is 0.2 mG in Russia. It has also been found that malignant cells grow 24 times faster under the influence of electromagnetic field, and this is considered to be due to extremely low frequencies and magnetic field. Greater attention should be paid to the high-frequency radiation, electrosmog.

In our homes, we are constantly exposed to the influence of the electromagnetic field, even when all our appliances are switched off. It is important to note that electrical energy has been in wide use since the 1930s, but it is only since the 1970s that serious health problems were reported. That is because it was only then that television stations started emitting their programmes at the UHF wavelengths, and emission power of radars controlling aircrafts was suddenly considerably increased.

- What is happening in our homes and offices?
Electrical appliances which contain electro-motors or transformers emanate highly penetrable electromagnetic beams. These beams penetrate concrete walls without weakening considerably. The only way of stopping them is by pulling the plugs out of the sockets.

- Homes in the vicinity of power-transmission stations
Every coil of a transformer (there are usually three) emanates its own electromagnetic beams, in two opposite directions, along its axis. There is a regulation which states that a person should not spend more than 60 minutes per day working on a power-transmission station. However, there are no such regulations as regards people living in the vicinity of power-transmission stations.

In Sweden, Norway, Denmark and the United States there exist associations of electrically and VDT injured persons. (look up http://www.feb.se) These people are extremely sensitive to radiation coming from the electric mains. They are forced to sleep outdoors, in trailers or in tents. Some of them are even forced to move far away from the civilisation, into the mountains where there are no power-transmission lines. This phenomenon ic most commonly found in Sweden and Norway. The Americans have named this phenomenon ‘The Scandinavian syndrome’, and explain it with the high number of mobile phones per capita in these countries. However, this phenomenon was noticed as far back as the early 1970s, when the Russians named it ‘The radar disease’. The electrically wounded persons’ condition only worsens with when they take hospital treatment, since hospitals are full of electrical appliances.

- How can we protect our homes, offices and hospitals?
The only satisfactory method I have found was that of installing the ‘microwave radiation absorber.’

- Protection against the radiation coming from neighbouring houses
It is not sufficient, nor neighbour-friendly, to only divert the detected beams of electrosmog. By installing the ‘microwave radiation absorber’ it is possible to remove those beams, by placing the absorber in the affected area.

- Where should the absorbers be placed?

Until 15-20 years ago, 3% of all marriages were childless. Today the percentage is 13-14%, with an upward tendency. The presence of the so-called ‘’women’s diseases’’ is increasing even more. The period of 15-20 years is too short for any evolutionary changes, so we should look for the cause of these diseases in environmental changes.

During the last 15-20 years, electromagnetic radiation and use of pesticides has increased. I personally think that in that fact lies the cause of these diseases.

My experience of ten years’ investigation led me to believe that women whose lower abdomen is exposed to radiation have problems with fertility, often with even more serious diseases.

If radiation comes from one side of a woman’s body and reaches her abdomen, then the ovary on the side of her body from where radiation comes is affected – it is cystic, and there is no possibility of pregnancy there. When radiation is removed, or the woman changes her bed or her bedroom, she often becomes pregnant during her first following ovulation. The pregnancy is normal, and there are no problems.

If electromagnetic beams come from below and go along the woman’s legs, serious diseases can occur (myoma, cervical tumor), and there is not even a chance of pregnancy. In this case, as well as in the previously mentioned case, the woman should be immediately removed from such a bed (and change rooms, if possible.) When her state is stabilized, the issue of pregnancy should be considered again.

In neither of these cases artificial insemination helps. I personally believe that this is because radiation destroys the egg cells.

A proof for this is the fact that the women mentioned in the first case have become pregnant as soon as radiation was removed.




Electromagnetic (E/M) field is electric and magnetic field which inevita­bly follows electrical energy. Physicists say that a magnetic field is a special form of matter with its own mass and energy, which forms around a conductor through which electrical current flows. The strength of a magnetic field declines rapidly as the distance from the conductor increases. An electric field is also a special kind of matter with its own mass and energy, forming around electrically charged conductors. In its surroundings, an electric field generates qualitative changes. An electric field grows considerably weaker as the distance increases. When we switch off all our household appliances at night, electric current ceases to flow through electric cables and the magnetic field disappears. Electric cables in walls remain charged, with the electrical field around them. Electric and magnetic fields spread at the rate of 300,000 km/sec., so that their energy is not at all negligible. When it acquires high parasitic frequencies, i.e. when it becomes modulated by them, the electromagnetic field of our electrical energy of 50 Hz transforms into electrosmog and becomes harmful to our health. It is dangerous as the wavelengths of these high parasitic frequencies are comparable to the dimensions of human organs. In most cases researchers blame the magnetic field for human diseases. The facts stated above indicate that this attitude is wrong and that the electric field is responsible, as it is more present and penetrating compared to the magnetic field.

Electromagnetic fields are emitted by devices for the production and transmission of electrical power and household appliances such as electrical clocks, razors, computers, TV sets, electric blankets, waterbeds, microwave ovens, radio receivers and cellular phones […]. On its way from the generating set to the consumer electrical power is transmitted through overhead and underground cables with low and high voltages. The length of these cables is measured by hundreds of thousands of kilometres. These cables are not only the transmitters of electrical energy, but also act like antennae receiving the Earth’s natural radiation, cosmic radiation and a wide range of high-frequency electromagnetic fields emitted by manmade devices. In many electrical devices there are electric motors and transformers, often both within a single device, and their coils emit beams of electromagnetic fields, even if switched off with a switch on the device or a remote control device. Electric motors and transformers consist of several hundred coils of wire (to strengthen their electromagnetic field which they need for their work), and emit beams of electromagnetic field ELF of 50 Hz, modulated by parasitic high frequencies, on both sides of their coils. These electro-magnetic beams with their parasitic field easily penetrate walls, even of reinforced concrete. They can also penetrate lead plates and are almost unstoppable.

The wavelength of the frequency of 50 Hz is 6,000 km, and that electromagnetic field cannot harm our health under normal circumstances, as the dimensions of our bodies are absolutely incomparable to the wavelength. It is important to note that if we connect the same devices to the set generating electrical energy, there is no parasitic electromagnetic field radiation. Electrical energy is produced there and is not transmitted through long cables, so it cannot be spoilt. That is pure electrical energy with no electrosmog. Before the 1970s we had fewer cancer diseases, as there were substantially fewer parasitic high-frequency electromagnetic fields, namely radiation beams only consisted of a 50 Hz field, so we cannot speak of the existence of electrosmog then. The above facts suggest that the main cause of electrosmog and modern diseases is polluted electrical energy.

Medical experts worldwide are nowadays making constant efforts to find the cause of the lethal disease of cancer and create an effective defence. Unfortunately, the results achieved do not correspond to the efforts, funds and expectations put into the attempt. For the past 20-30 years we have experienced an amazing advancement of medical and technical sciences, which enabled us to look, with the aid of modern medical devices, into the human organism, to watch how the organs are functioning and screen them. Now we can glance into the hidden parts of distant planets, photograph them when and how we like, and we can get the desired information from such enormous distances. Never throughout the history of mankind has such a great breakthrough in science, technology and the quality of human life taken place in such a short time. Despite this immense advance, no cause of cancerous human diseases has been found so far, while the number of people who contracted it or died is growing each year. This especially refers to the diseases of breasts, lungs and brain. Breast and lung cancers have assumed a mild epidemic form. The number of affected women is constantly growing, by 3% per annum. In the period from 1970 to 1996 the number of affected women rose by 171%. Within the same period of time the number of women who died of breast cancer increased by 47%. The number of women who died per 100,000 patients has been almost constant for years, which also demonstrates the inefficiency of science with respect to this disease.

Extremely disturbing is the fact that in the USA one in eight women are affected by breast cancer this year, whereas two years ago that ratio was one to nine. The situation in Europe is somewhat better, which might be a relief, but it is certain that soon we will reach the ratio 1:8, while the US ratio will probably fall to 1:7. I say probably as the prospects of achieving an advance in finding the cause of cancerous diseases before long are slight, as the medical science has persistently been looking for the culprit among bacteria, bacilli, viruses, in genetics etc., namely in the human organism. So far medicine has not found the cause of cancerous diseases in the human organism as it is not there, but it has incessantly, for many years, been following the same route of investigations and running in a vicious circle.

How are we to explain this great and rapid rise in the number of people who developed the disease or died within such a short period? This cannot be explained by the fact that something happened to man’s immunological system which suddenly rendered it inefficient in protecting the organism. A quarter of a century is negligible with respect to human evolution. The explanation should be sought in the probability that in the same period something harmful to our health happened in our environment, to which our immunological system is unable to respond promptly and efficiently and protect the organism.

The past several decades have been marked by a sudden development in electronics and its wide range of applications in many fields of science and technology, which in turn resulted in a rapid expansion of devices emitting high-frequency radiation. The advancement in science and technology contributes to changes in man’s environment, introducing new factors which, apart from benefits, also bring adverse effects. The rapid increase in the number of electric and electronic devices, including a surge in telecommunications systems, has increased the possibility of higher exposure of people to electromagnetic radiations with ever higher frequencies, and in turn of detrimental effects to human health. The beginning of the 1970s is the time when the exploitation of TV programmes in the UHF region of 470 mHz – 806 mHz (63cm – 37cm) started, as well as an increase in the number and power of radars, due to a sudden development of air traffic. The army started using the frequency of 900 mHz (33 cm) for its communication systems. Many towns got their TV stations with the accompanying transmitters and repeater stations, while cities got airports with radars and navigation devices. By the end of the seventies, radars came to be more widely used in meteorology. In brief, since the beginning of the 1970s microwave frequencies have been used increasingly, which has continued to the present, with the introduction of mobile telephony with its repeater stations.

The concurrence of the rapid rise in the number of cancer-affected persons with putting into operation devices emitting microwave radiations is not accidental. Neither is the coincidence of a rise in the number of skin-cancer patients with the weakening of the ozone layer around our planet. It takes place owing to increased radiation which reaches the Earth’s surface with greater intensity, which is also an effect of human activity.

At this point, we should remember that there always existed natural radiation from underground sources, the so-called geopathological radiation. I personally think that this radiation is more harmful to human health, and that it has been causing cancerous diseases during the last few centuries. The frequency of geopathological radiations is said to be 300GHz (1mm), and that could be the reason why they are harmful to human health.

The question arises: why are women’s breasts the organs most prone to cancerous diseases? Is it not because the most part of a breast is practically situated on the outside of the organism, and is, as such, the most exposed organ to harmful environmental influences? The fact that cancerous tissue is mainly found on the outside of a breast could be used as a proof for this conclusion. The medical science can not give explanation for the fact that in 68% of the cases malignant tissue is found on the left breast. Both my research and experience indicate that it is because in most cases husbands sleep on the woman’s right, thus protecting the right breast from electrosmog beams coming from that side. These men often develop cancer on their right lung. Men who sleep on the woman’s left protect her left breast but develop cancer on their left lung, if radiation was coming from that direction. I have also found that:

     -Malignant tissue does not occur on the inside quarters of the breast
     -Radiation affecting the upper and the lower quarters of a breast is different, and in those cases the position of the husband in bed is of no importance.
     -Women develop lung cancer more rarely than men, because breasts absorb radiation completely, thus protecting the lungs, but suffering themselves.
     -Among women who sleep on their own, left and right breasts develop cancer equally frequently; right breasts even slightly more frequently.

In Japan, it has not been noticed that left breasts develop cancer more frequently. It is well known that breast cancer is found less frequently in Japan than in other industrialized countries. The medical science explains this by higher consumption of sea food in this country. I think it is because the Japanese sleep on special mattresses, called futons, which are laid on the floor in the evening, and folded away in the morning. It hardly ever happens that the futon is laid in exactly the same place as on the previous night. Because of this, a person sleeping on it will not expose the same part of the body to radiation for a very long period of time. In respect to all other environmental conditions, such as density of population and number of electric devices per household, the Japanese should develop cancer more often than they do.

During the past ten years I have examined beds of more than 350 women who had had a breast operation or died of breast cancer. In all cases I found that they were exposed to electrosmog at the breast level, coming from the side of the affected breast. In almost 99% of the cases, the women were exposed to radiation in their beds, where they have been sleeping for over a year. The other 1% of the women were exposed to radiation in their offices, by computers, fax machines, photocopiers an so on.

I have examined beds of ten women who died of breast cancer. They were all exposed to radiation as previously described. It is important to say that all these women had returned to the same beds after undergoing radical surgery and haemo-therapy, thus getting exposed to the radiation again. This resulted in relapse of the disease after around two years. I think that this is not metastasis, but a new disease caused by electrosmog. This could be considered as proof that the cause of cancerous diseases is extra-organic, that they are caused by external factors from our environment, the electrosmog. If we accept this postulation, as there is no alternative to it, we may cease to look for cause of cancerous diseases in the human organism, since that point of view has brought no results up to the present day.

It is not logical that the left breast should develop cancer more often than the right one. They both share the same organism, blood circulation system, lungs, stomach etc. Oncologists think that it is so because women use their right hand more often, thus enhancing the blood circulation in that area. I cannot accept that explanation, since we do not have separate hearts for the left and the right part of the organism. It is a fact that left-handed women also develop cancer on the left breast.

Physicists, engineers, chemists, agricultural engineers and other experts in technical sciences should join this research, because it is their field of work that caused the changes in the environment, and they have knowledge about those changes. It is not their fault that they are late in joining the research into cause of cancerous diseases, but it is urgent and necessary that they do, since it is the only way to confront this malicious disease.

Many years have passed while unsuccessful research was taking place, we are paying a very high price; the time is running out and it is necessary that the direction of research changes.

The first and foremost reason for the great rise in the incidence of malignant diseases is the rise in the level of electrosmog radiation. The development of those diseases in women is so frequent it can almost be called an epidemic. My first suspicions regarding the official medical theory arose in 1991-1992. At that time, at the request of my friends and relatives, I was engaged in detecting electrosmog radiation in their flats. I was doing that by means of simple implements I had constructed, the operation of which was based on the laws of physics. One of them was a movable coil – a ring of 20 cm in diameter, consisting of six conductors. The second detector consisted of two movable solenoids. The third detector is a refined biotensor, which is used in medicine in bioresonance therapy. I also own an instrument for measuring the electromagnetic field which I bought, but do not use it anymore because it cannot measure geophysical radiation coming from underground sources. This instrument is suitable for measuring the electromagnetic field the frequency of which we know in advance. As it is not always possible to know it beforehand, I abandoned it altogether. At that time I did not have the absorber for radiation protection, but asked the people I visited to remove from their bedrooms all electrical and electronic devices (TV sets, video recorders, digital electrical clocks etc.). In case I detected geophysical radiation, we moved the beds away from the radiation lines. As regards exposure to geophysical radiation, the disease is more severe and develops faster. The disease is always malignant. It probably derives from the fact that frequencies of geophysical radiation are very high, reaching up to 300 GHz. At that time I had several cases of breast cancer in women. They had all been operated and in all the cases I found in their beds beams of radiation which were exactly hitting the diseased breast. There were no exceptions. The situation was similar with lung cancer. This disease is more severe than breast cancer, especially if it is caused by geophysical radiations. As far as I can remember, out of some ten patients I met no one survived. After the operation, radiation and chemotherapy they would usually return to their old beds and again be exposed to radiation. The disease returned, but now in a graver form, and the patients’ condition deteriorated. It also usually happens to women with breast cancer. Their whole breasts have to be removed in the next operation. If the women come back to their old beds, in most cases they cannot be saved because the corresponding lung is now unprotected. Lung diseases are much less frequent in women, probably because their breasts completely absorb electrosmog radiation, thus protecting the lungs but suffering as a result. If a dysplasia is found in the breasts, rest assured that they are exposed to electrosmog radiation. Breast dysplasia is a definite sign that a more serious disease – tumour – will follow if the woman does not move from the radiation lines. Inner breast surfaces cannot be affected by radiation because one shields the other. If one breast is amputated, the inner side of the other breast is no longer shielded or protected, and the tumour can develop. This happens because the removed breast used to absorb the radiation coming from its side, thus protecting the other breast. When it disappears, and the woman remains in her old bed, the disease develops on the inner side of the other breast. This is the only way the inner sides can become diseased as a result of radiation. Around the beginning of the 1990s I was surprised by the high number of young married couples without offspring. When I asked them why they were childless, they usually answered: “We have been to examinations and everything is all right with me, and he is healthy too”. Twenty years ago only 3% of marriages – couples were infertile, while 14% of them now have the sterility problem. What has actually happened in male and female organisms to make them so infertile in twenty years’ time? Absolutely nothing! The problem lies in their environment. If a woman is exposed to radiation which comes from one side and crosses her ovaries, there is no hope of pregnancy. The ovary closer to the radiation source regularly contains a cyst. If a man is exposed to radiation up his legs along the central part of the body, he will have problems with his prostate and scrotum, even haemorrhoids. Pregnancy will not occur in this case either, but now man is the “culprit”. If a woman is exposed to radiation up her legs along the central part of the body, serious problems will arise: polyps, myoma, tumour of the uterus. Pregnancy is unthinkable. These couples cannot even benefit from in vitro fertilization. In case of women being exposed to lateral radiation which crossed their ovaries, it has happened several times that they got pregnant through natural intercourse on the first fertile days after the installation of radiation protection. The same effect can be achieved if the couple change their room, or at least the bed. I know that around 120 children were born to such couples after I installed the radiation absorbers. Around the beginning of 1997 I noticed that the left breast in women developed malignant tumours in 2/3 of the cases, and the right breast in one third. I found it illogical, incomprehensible, and was totally confused. How could this happen when both breasts were part of the same organism, functioning on the same blood stream, the same lungs, the same stomach etc.? It was totally unacceptable to me, being illogical. In order to solve this mystery, I went to the Institute of Oncology of Serbia and asked a professor how this was possible and where I had made a mistake. The professor replied that I was wrong only in percentages, because the difference was bigger. The left breast became diseased in 68%, and the right one in 32% of cases. I asked again how that was possible. The professor told me that women worked more with their right hands, so that the blood flow on that side was faster, thus providing better protection. To my objection that we did not have one heart for the left, and another for the right side of our bodies, and that there was only one vascular system, the professor answered rather angrily that he was not guilty that I had strayed into oncology and that it was “the official position of medicine”. I left the Institute now not only confused but also angry, for I remembered a woman whose left breast was diseased, and her husband used to sleep on her right side. In their flat there was no radiation directed towards her left breast. She was left-handed, which rarely occurs in women, and did everything with her left hand, and her left breast still developed cancer. In her office, she kept the fax, printer and telephone on the left side of the table. I found that her left breast had been exposed to radiation of the fax and the printer. In other words, both the professor and “the official position of medicine” were wrong. I must admit that I was fired up by spite, a trait frequently encountered in Serbs, and I decided to address this problem more thoroughly and explore it. The reason for the greater incidence of left breast cancer is that the husband usually sleeps on the right side of the bed, i.e. to the right of his wife, so that his wife is “by his right hand”. In such a way he shields the wife’s whole right side from any possible radiation, while the wife shields the husband’s whole left side. Here we should bear in mind that around 20% of women sleep on their stomachs, so that their right breast can develop cancer even if the husband sleeps on their right side. If the husband is left-handed, which is more common, the wife usually lies on his right-hand side. In this case the woman’s right breast can become diseased, as well as the man’s left lung. As regards married couples sleeping in different rooms or separate beds the incidence of tumour in the left and right breasts, and in the left and right lung is totally identical. This comes from my experience of twenty years during which I have been to over 800 flats where I measured radiation and devised protection. I have also visited over 350 women with complaints relating to breasts, the uterus, ovaries, hips, “sterility” etc. In all these cases, without exception, I detected beams of radiation across their beds, which hit exactly the diseased body part. In 2-3% of the cases the exposure occurred in the workplace (computer, fax, photocopiers etc.). Owing to this experience, I can freely claim that electrosmog radiation is the main cause of benign and malignant tumours in both women and men. Women develop the disease more often than men, which I think is due to the female reproductive organs which are highly sensitive to electrosmog radiation. The Japanese pride themselves on having a lower incidence of malignant tumours compared to Europeans and Americans. They explain it by the fact that they eat more seafood. It is a fact that the Japanese should have a higher incidence of the disease than either Europe or America, because of their miniature flats, a much higher population density, and a larger number of electrical and electronic devices in their flats. In my opinion, the reason for the lower incidence of cancer with the Japanese is the way they sleep. It is well-known that the Japanese do not sleep in beds like Europeans or Americans. They sleep on special mattresses – “futons” – which they lay on the floor in the evening, and fold up and put into the closet in the morning. The next evening they lay the futon on the floor again. It is most likely that they will not lay the futon on exactly the same place every time, but 2-3 cm lower or higher, to the left or to the right. The place of the body changes as a result, so that the same place will not always be exposed to radiation. In this way the organism can be protected from any beam of radiation since the “point of application” changes. It is similar with professions which require frequent changes of the place of sleeping. Members of those professions do not develop tumours. They are e.g. travelling salesman, pilots, stewardesses, tennis players and their referees, circus staff, film actors, singers, conductors etc. Here we should specially bear in mind crews of ships, where thousands of men and women stay and work. They all undergo regular medical examinations, and medical records are kept for each one of them. The staff of ships cannot develop tumours as they obtain the electrical current from the ship generator, without a trace of parasitic high frequencies. Besides having “pure” electrical energy, they cannot be exposed to geophysical radiation because the ship is moving all the time. In these and similar professions you will not find people with diseases caused by electrosmog. Glands These organs deserve a separate section being highly sensitive to radiation owing to their capacity to absorb electrosmog radiation. In this case as well women are more susceptible than men. Radiation primarily affects the breasts, the ovaries, the kidneys, the thyroid gland etc. I think that the reason of this extreme sensitivity of women is the capacity of their glands to absorb radiation. I attribute it to the spongy structure of glands. I can prove this by a simple experiment. If the glands are exposed to radiation, the whole organism is endangered. In case of disease of the kidneys, the usual cause is geophysical radiation directed from under the bed towards the small of the patient’s back. The doctors first remove the diseased kidney. If the patient returns to his/her bed and is exposed to radiation again, the other kidney suffers too and dialyses follow. As regards the radiation of the scrotum, one side is affected at first, but if the patient is re-exposed to radiation, the other side will also be diseased. In cases of leukaemia I ALWAYS find a beam of radiation hitting the patient directly at the vertex. Mortality is very high, though much lower in children. With people suffering from multiple sclerosis I ALWAYS detect a beam of radiation hitting the head from one side, slightly above the middle ear. Mortality is high. In cases of diseased colon, there are always two beams of electrosmog intersecting above the patient’s stomach. One beam is apparently insufficient for the disease to develop. In these patients’ homes I regularly discovered that one beam came from the TV set. Mortality is very high. In case of diseased hips, radiation hits the closer hip on the side. That hip will suffer first, probably because the glands do not secrete enough liquid for “lubricating” the joint. If after the hip replacement surgery the patient comes back to the same bed, i.e. exposes him/herself to radiation, the other hip will have to be operated. The main source of electrosmog is “dirty” electric energy which is overflowing with parasitic signals of mobile telephony, signals of TV stations, FM stations, police and military radio stations and many other users of radio lines. Electrical energy has the frequency of 50 Hz (an extremely low frequency) which under normal conditions is not harmful to human health. When this low frequency becomes modulated by the high frequencies of the parasitic signals, those high frequencies enter our apartments and offices, the appliances we use, through power lines and the basic frequency of 50 Hz. The aforementioned high frequencies are a health hazard. We could not bear the thought of having muddy, dirty water running from our taps. If such water appeared, we would instantly recognize danger. It is similar with electric power. “Dirty” electricity constantly flows through power lines, but is invisible to our eyes. Electric power plants take advantage of that fact and deliver to us defective, health-hazardous goods – “muddy” electricity with impunity. This can be clearly demonstrated on any good-quality oscilloscope. You can now see for yourselves who the main culprits are for so many people suffering from carcinoma. Tumour of the lungs is much rarer in women than in men. This arises from the fact that the breasts absorb a major part of radiation and thus protect the lungs. If radiation comes from underneath and hits the back, the radiation beam penetrates the back to the lungs. This is usually geophysical radiation or some technical radiation coming from lower floors. In most cases it is geophysical radiation and the tumour is always malignant. A further problem is that women can endure pains longer than men, and are often late for a medical examination. The mortality in this case is also rather high. The large majority of both female and male patients were non-smokers. Regarding the cases of extremely obese women and men who are quite moderate eaters, it often turns out that the bed in which they sleep is exposed to radiation of several beams of electrosmog. When I install protection, those persons begin losing 3-4 l of liquid on daily basis and their weight suddenly drops. I think that the cause of such obesity is that the organism accumulates liquid to protect against radiation. Once the radiation disappears, the organism is relieved of the excess liquid and weight loss follows. I tried to determine the causal relationship between smoking and developing lung tumour. I failed in that attempt as the diseased smokers I visited had radiation directed towards the diseased lung. Bearing in mind that the number of smokers has conspicuously fallen in the last 10-15 years, owing to the big rise in the number of tumour patients, and the fact that almost everyone now smokes filtered cigarettes, I am inclined to conclude that smoking is not the cause of tumour development. It goes without saying that, when the disease has developed, smoking can certainly accelerate the progress of the disease and worsen the patient’s general condition. In conclusion concerning smoking and lung cancer I can say I have never had a case of a diseased smoker who was not exposed to electrosmog radiation. I expect that many professional medical researchers will be quite surprised when they read the results of this twenty years’ research, because I do not come from the medical profession and the results are totally different from what they expect. For that reason I would like to stress that everything I have concluded and written has been repeatedly tested and is absolutely true. All these results can be tested in some medical institution, especially in a hospital with a sufficient number of patients suffering from the diseases I have explored. In case of patients diagnosed with cancer it is essential for me to go to their flats and measure electrosmog radiation on their beds. This should be done in the presence of one onco-epidemiologist who would see precisely where the radiation beam was hitting the patient. .

Svetislav Jordović (1933), engineer of electronics, researcher in the area of harmful effects of EMF radiation on the health of humans, owner of patent No. 48657 for the invention of absorptive protective device against electrosmog radiation.
 

• MICROWAVE RADIATION BEAM DOES NOT PENETRATE THE BREAST • RADIATION ENERGY IS ABSORBED AND CONSUMED BY BREAKING UP TISSUE MOLECULES • THIS MICROWAVE RADIATION CAUSES BREAST CANCER THE SUDDEN INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE AFFECTED BY CANCER DURING THE RECENT DECADES Medical experts worldwide are working incessantly on finding the cause of cancer, and creating efficient defence. Unfortunately, the achieved results do not correspond to the invested efforts, funds and expectations. Over the past 20-30 years we have been witnessing an incredible advancement in medicine and technical science, which enabled us to look inside human organism, watch the organs function and record those processes using modern medical equipment. We look at distant planets, take pictures of them, and obtain desired information across a vast space. Never before in the history of humankind did such an advancement of science, technology and quality of life take place in such a short period of time. Despite this great advancement, the cause of cancer among humans has not yet been found, and the number of affected and deceased people is rising each year. Breast cancer can be said to have become an epidemic disease. The number of affected women increases by 3% per annum. Between 1970 and 1996, it rose by 171%, and the number of deceased women rose by 47% during this period. The ratio between affected and deceased women remained the same, which also indicates the impotence of science when it comes to this disease. The fact that in the USA one in eight women is affected by breast cancer this year, whereas two years ago that ratio was one to nine, is extremely disturbing. The situation in Europe is somewhat better, which might be a relief, but it is certain that soon we will reach the ratio of 1:8. I say probably because the prospects of achieving an advancement in finding the cause of cancerous diseases before long are slight, since the medical science is persistently looking for the culprit among bacteria, bacilli, viruses, in genetics etc., namely in the human organism. So far medicine has not found the cause of cancerous diseases in the human organism as it is not there, but it has incessantly, for many years, been following the same route of investigations and running in a vicious circle. How are we to explain this great and rapid rise in the number of people who developed the disease or died within such a short period? This cannot be explained by the fact that something happened to man’s immunological system which suddenly rendered it inefficient in protecting the organism. A quarter of a century is negligible with respect to human evolution. The explanation should be sought in the probability that in the same period something harmful to our health happened in our environment, to which our immunological system is unable to respond promptly and efficiently and protect the organism. WHAT HAS CHANGED IN OUR ENVIRONMENT OVER THE RECENT DECADES? The past several decades have been marked by a sudden development in electronics and its wide range of applications in many fields of science and technology, which in turn resulted in a rapid expansion of devices emitting high-frequency radiation. The advancement in science and technology contributes to changes in man’s environment, introducing new factors which, apart from benefits, also bring adverse effects. The rapid increase in the number of electric and electronic devices, including a surge in telecommunications systems, has increased the possibility of higher exposure of people to electromagnetic radiations with ever higher frequencies, and in turn of detrimental effects to human health. The beginning of the 1970s is the time when the exploitation of TV programmes in the UHF region of 470 mHz – 806 mHz started, as well as an increase in the number and power of radars, due to a sudden development of air traffic. Many towns got their TV stations with the accompanying transmitters and repeater stations, while cities got airports with radars and navigation devices. By the end of the seventies, radars came to be more widely used in meteorology. In brief, since the end of the 1960s microwave frequencies have been used increasingly, which has continued to the present, with the introduction of mobile telephony with its repeater stations. The concurrence of the rapid rise in the number of cancer-affected persons with putting into operation devices emitting microwave radiations is not accidental. Neither is the coincidence of a rise in the number of skin-cancer patients with the weakening of the ozone layer around our planet. It takes place owing to increased radiation which reaches the Earth’s surface with greater intensity, which is also an effect of human activity. WHY ARE BREASTS PRONE TO CANCEROUS DESEASES? Is it not because the most part of a breast is practically situated on the outside of the organism, and is, as such, the most exposed organ to harmful environmental influences? The fact that cancerous tissue is mainly found on the outside of a breast could be used as a proof for this conclusion WHY IS THE LEFT BREAST MORE OFTEN AFFECTED? Medical science does not offer an explanation for this. Both my research and experience indicate that it is because in most cases husbands sleep on the woman’s right, thus protecting the right breast from electrosmog beams coming from that side. Among women who sleep on their own, left and right beasts are affected equally frequently, the right breast cancer occurring even slightly more often. In Japan, it has not been noticed that left breasts develop cancer more frequently. It is well known that breast cancer is found less frequently in Japan than in other industrialized countries. The medical science explains this by higher consumption of sea food in this country. I think it is because the Japanese sleep on special mattresses, called futons, which are laid on the floor in the evening, and folded away in the morning. It hardly ever happens that the futon is laid in exactly the same place as on the previous night. Because of this, a person sleeping on it will not expose the same part of the body to radiation for a very long period of time. With respect to all other environmental conditions, such as density of population and number of electric devices per household, the Japanese should develop cancer more often than they do. MY EXPERIENCE SO FAR During the past ten years I have examined beds of more than 350 women who had had a breast operation or died of breast cancer. In all cases I found that they were exposed to electrosmog at the breast level, coming from the side of the affected breast. I have examined beds of twenty women who died of breast cancer. They were all exposed to radiation as previously described. It is important to say that all these women had returned to the same beds after undergoing radical surgery, thus getting exposed to the radiation again. This resulted in relapse of the disease after around two years. I think that this is not metastasis, but a new disease caused by electrosmog. This could be considered the proof that the cause of cancerous diseases is extra-organic, i.e. that the disease is caused by an external factor from our environment. If we accept this hypothesis, we should stop looking for the cause of cancer inside the human organism, since it has brought no results so far. We should look for the culprit in our environment. HOW CAN WE PROTECT OURSELVES AGAINST BREAST CANCER? On going to bed, unplug all electrical appliances (with the exception of refrigerators and freezers, naturally.) Move the bed you are sleeping on each month, by at least 20cm. HOW SHOULD WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH BREAST CANCER AND THE WOMEN IN POST-OP STAGE PROTECT THEMSELVES? They absolutely have to change their bedrooms, or at least the position of the bed in the room. On going to bed, they should unplug all electrical appliances. The electrosmog absorber should also be installed in their bedrooms and offices. WHO SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN FURTHER RESEARCH? Physicists, engineers, chemists, agricultural engineers and other experts in technical sciences should join this research, because it is their field of work that caused the changes in the environment, and they have knowledge about those changes. It is not their fault that they are late in joining the research into cause of cancerous diseases, but it is urgent and necessary that they do, since it is the only way to confront this malicious disease.   Over the past ten years, the number of prematurely born babies has increased significantly. The medical science explains this by stressful situations in the family, poverty, different diseases the mothers-to-be suffer from (heart diseases, haemodialysis, diabetes, epilepsy etc.), and infections of the foetus. It can also be explained by the fact that women have their first children later in life than before, and by the increased frequency of artificial insemination. Such pregnancies are usually multiple ones, and premature birth is what usually follows. As the number of premature births increases, so does the number of babies who spend up to two months in incubators. By the same ratio, the number of babies with permanently damaged organs has increased. This is commonly attributed to over-dosing by oxygen. However, I believe that the existing incubators are technically imperfect, since they emanate strong electro-magnetic field of high frequency (namely, electrosmog), and that new ones have to be constructed. Three constituent parts of incubators emanate electromagnetic radiation. And so do certain other pieces of equipment in neonatology departments, such as respirators, monitors, infusion pumps, laboratory equipment, computers, mobile phones etc. It is understandable that the process of organ formation is not completed in prematurely born babies, but how can we expect those organs to develop successfully on highly irradiated premises, and in badly constructed incubators? During many years of working on electrosmog protection, I have met adults with permanently damaged eyes or ears, and they had been exposed to such radiation. Besides, no astronaut returned from a journey into space with damaged organs, although they sometimes spend over a year breathing pure oxygen. Same is the case with atomic submarines, where hundreds of members of the crew do not come out to the surface for up to six months, breathing only pure oxygen. This plainly speaks against the aforementioned theory. If we want to secure conditions similar to their mothers' wombs to the prematurely born babies, we have to improve the conditions inside the incubators, and on the premises they are in. It should be requested of the manufacturers of incubators to produce new types of incubators, which would not emanate such radiation, but also to alter the existing incubators, so that they no longer cause such damage. To reinforce this request, the manufacturers should be reminded that parents of babies with damaged organs can sue them, and that charges for causing invalidity are astronomical.